Hill pellets in United States
The reading and the lecture are both about the Hail pellets which had led to crop failure, after it was reduced by the cloud seeding in some area of United states. In this process they had sprayed the silver iodide on storm clouds. The author of reading believes that evidence that cloud seeding has been effective in protecting crops from Hail. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the reading passage.
Firstly, the author thinks that laboratory experiments support that, when they had add silver iodide in cold water vapor, they often observed snow forming instead of hail pellets. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He states that it is possible in laboratory. In real life silver iodide prevent the precipitation on cloud, whether it produces the rain, snow or hail. Therefore, decrease in rain causes drought.
Secondly, the author states about evidence from Asia, where cloud seeding has been successfully used to control precipitation in urban area. The lecturer refutes this point by asserting that in urban area more amount of pollutants. He elaborates on this by mentioning that pollutants are more favorable for cloud seeding, so they interact with the clouds. In United States hills pellets were fall in farms where no pollutants are available, so it is not effective.
Finally, the author mentions that local study has been said that, where the cloud seeding was used there was reduced hail damage compared to previous years. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that local study has been done on just that area where cloud seeding was performed. He puts forth the idea that in that year surrounding area of damaged area are all not affected by hill pellets, because of naturally variation on atmosphere.
- tour guide trip is better 70
- Torreya in Florida becoming an extinct 75
- it is better to work in group which have similar idea rather than which have different ideas than us 60
- y topics:Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or mee 63
- traditional encyclopedias comparison with the online encyclopedia 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'added'.
Suggestion: added
...experiments support that, when they had add silver iodide in cold water vapor, they...
^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'added'.
Suggestion: added
...experiments support that, when they had add silver iodide in cold water vapor, they...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04137931034 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45788304454 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527586206897 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8505986276 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.375 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163718787328 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566945815872 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107355997129 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967195947222 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688098985277 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.