The history of the United Kingdom

Essay topics:

The history of the United Kingdom

The article introduces the theme of asteroids.
More specifically, the writer discusses about the benefits of colonizing on asteroids.
In the reading, the author begins by stating that since asteroids have low gravity compared to planets, it would be easier to land.
The lecturer, however, disagrees with this viewpoint. He states that there will be also bad consequences related to health if there are low gravity.
The author also claims that asteroids are wealth in precious elements such as gold and platinum. Hence, colonists or businesses that are sponsoring can support and pay even more money.
Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s argument. The speaker holds that even though there are valuable elements, it would be expensive to send them back to earth.
The writer in the reading passage says that it is easy to attain them. For example; some asteroids are closer than our moon, which means that spacecraft even can return from asteroids.
The professor in the listening is skeptical about this. He explains that asteroids are moving from one spot to another. Therefore, even though it could be easy to reach, very likely that spacecraft can return back.
To sum up, both the writer and professor will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-15 ormon200678 3 view
2023-06-15 ormon200678 3 view
2022-01-22 nusybah 70 view
2021-08-18 nusybah 3 view
2021-08-18 nusybah 3 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 202, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
... reach, very likely that spacecraft can return back. To sum up, both the writer and profe...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for example, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13679245283 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53134057749 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608490566038 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6526719186 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.6 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1333333333 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.09492273731 220% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.