Human life on Venus
The reading and the lecture are both about the human life on Venus. the author of the reading feels that the life of a human on Venus can not be found on Venus. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of opinion that human life on Venus can be challenging but it is possible.
First, the author argues that pressure at Venus is 90 times that on earth. The article mentions that there is a lot of pressure on Venus that each spacecraft will be crushed if it will land on the planet's surface even human will be crushed. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that we can use flooding spacecraft like a balloon. Additionally, he says that this flooding ballon will be instead of landing on surface spacecraft and will flood 50 kilometers above-surface so at this height the pressure will be the same as pressure on earth.
Secondly, the writer suggests that there is no water, and Oxygen at Venus. In the article, it is said that Venus's surface has carbon dioxide, sulfuric acid, and nitrogen and it will be difficult to bring water and Oxygen supply from the earth. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that we can use the chemicals on Venus's surface to produce water and Oxygen. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that by using carbon dioxide, and sulfuric acid to make water, and Oxygen so we will not need to import them.
Finally, the author posits that little amount of sunlight that will be available at Venus's surface. Moreover, the article stated that sixty percent of sunlight will be reflected in space by thick clouds and 40 percent of sunlight can pass through sunlight but due to presence of carbon dioxide will prevent more sunlight from reaching Venus's surface. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that the clouds above a certain height will not be thick. He notes that these not thick clouds will pass sunlight and the reflected ones from the thick cloud can run stations.
In conclusion, the lecturer's opinion opposes the author's opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-20 | Zahra Attaran Bondarabadi | 60 | view |
| 2021-03-05 | hind aljubori | 71 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | servatan7 | 80 | view |
| 2018-09-25 | shaista | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...are both about the human life on Venus. the author of the reading feels that the li...
^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...d can run stations. In conclusion, the lecturers opinion opposes the authors opinion.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...sion, the lecturers opinion opposes the authors opinion.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 5.04856512141 396% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72112676056 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4326125154 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442253521127 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2460545488 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199446363908 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10482819985 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186095475302 0.0662205650399 281% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139337989635 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222410407243 0.0443174109184 502% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.