humpback whales, intelligence, brain, shark, migrate, straight line, star, navigate, spy-hopping, intelligent
In this set of material, both the author of the reading passage and the lecturer are discussing about humpback whales. The migration path of these kind of whales is not certain. While the author declares that they are probably navigating by the stars, the professor says that although it's fascinating, there is not any convincing evidence to show they use stars for navigation. In what follows, reasons of both the author of the reading and the lecturer will be substantiated.
Firstly, both the author and the lecturer explain whales’ brain intelligence as a manner for using stars. According to reading, it is said that their intelligence is enough to use stars. On the other hand, the professor states that other animals like birds are intelligent, such as ducks. So, there is no connection between intelligence and using stars for navigation.
Secondly, the author asserts that starlight lines are humpback whales migration path. In contrast, the lecturer believes they can migrate in straight lines by another external force such as magnetic field. Their brain is bio magnetic, and it is sensitive to magnetic field. Thus, humpback whales can navigate by magnetic field rather than using stars.
Finally, the author of the passage proclaims that humpback whales show an uncommon behavior and put their heads on the water surface to looking upward and stars. But, the professor says that there is nothing to do with it. Some other animals like sharks also do this. They look to other animals to hunt them during the day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... humpback whales. The migration path of these kind of whales is not certain. While the aut...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in contrast, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06719367589 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59573977658 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5489708305 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.125 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138441846755 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455548948394 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372076165464 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802912708901 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317884031154 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.