Integrated. Construction
The lecturer reasons against the city council proposal for reconstruction. The construction claims to improve the area and attract people to the downtown, provide hundreds of accommodations, and create new job opportunities. However, the lecturer refutes all the mentioned claims via the following arguments.
First of all, the constructions will ruin the view of the lake, which belongs to everybody. On the other hand a park can serve all the visitors and the local. Thus, the lecturer believes that making a park between the lake and bay will be a more reasonable decision. This opposes the proposal that says the plan will make the place attractive and enjoyable for all people.
Secondly, although the housings offered by the plan will accommodate a significant number of dwellers, they are too expensive for lower-class people. Thus, the workers who are to be working at the downtown shops cannot afford them. This undermines the plan's claim for resolving the city's need for new residential.
Finally, the constructions will damage the natural habitat of the place by cutting a considerable number of trees. Therefore, it costs a lot to the environment while filling the pockets of the constructors. This rejects the claim that the development plan can economically be beneficial to the whole city.
- Compare and contrast the advantages of choosing a stable career over an adventurous lifestyle use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion 93
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 62
- Believing or not the newspapers 86
- integrated task 90
- Some people believe that mothers should not work Others argue against this Consider the problems that a working mother faces Do you think mothers should work 90
the city council proposal
the city council's proposal
flaws:
No. of Words: 210 250
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 210 250
No. of Characters: 1070 1200
No. of Different Words: 120 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.095 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.913 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 77 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.461 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.576 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4