integrated essay TPO17
The reading passage mainly discusses that there are several harmful damages for wildlife especially for birds by increasing of human population, he provides three reasons to support. On the other hand, the professor refutes the authors' view by some reasons and he believes that these reasons are not conveniencable.
First of all, the article states that when population of human enhancing, they need more place and settler, thus they expand in more locations which its result is decrease in population of birds. On the contrary, the speaker claims that birds have an abilities to find various habitats and they can fly in another cities and match at there.
In addition, the text asserts that as increasing in agriculture activities for prepare the fundamentally needs of human, therefore, this makes more destructive of birds niches. However, in the lecture the speaker believes that this theory is true that agriculture is not good for birds but not as mentioned on the reading. He argues that try to new products and harvesting some crops is necessary for human.
Finally, the reading states that by raising of human locations and need to producing more seeds and grains, due to use some dangerous materials such as pesticides to protect their products, thus, continue to decline of wildlife. While the professor posits that pesticides are harmfully for animals but this developed by growing more crops genetically, which it don’t need to use of pesticides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage mainly discusses tha...
^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an ability' or simply 'abilities'?
Suggestion: an ability; abilities
...ary, the speaker claims that birds have an abilities to find various habitats and they can f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'need to produce'?
Suggestion: need to produce
... that by raising of human locations and need to producing more seeds and grains, due to use some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21008403361 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74287053053 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9957262616 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.777777778 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6666666667 7.06452816374 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322577917782 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12150321994 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060204462344 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175228592898 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461896961662 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.