integrated writing
The writer of the article and the lecturer talk about the rising sea level. The writer claims that there is not much to worry about the rising sea level. However, the lecturer states that the rate at which sea level is rising is alarming and it will have detrimental effects on our planet.
Firstly, the writer claims that melting of polar ice caps is not responsible for rise in sea level. In contrast, the lecturer states that the melting of permafrost is causing the sea level to increase. It is unnatural for the ice that are on land to melt. Furthermore, she gives an example of large blocks of perma-frost ice melting in countries like Greenland. As these large blocks of ice on land melt, they add large amount of water into the oceans, thus causing sea level to rise.
Secondly, the writer states that the NASA has no clue about the source of the water that is driving the sea level up. On the other hand, the lecturer says that current data available cannot tell the amount of water being added to oceans, seas due to melting of permafrost but it has been proven by NASA that melting of these ice blocks can cause the sea level to rise.
Finally, the writer feels that the planet is going through a certain phase since Earth has seen many variations in sea levels. At one point of time, half of the land mass was inundated by water. The lecturer disagrees with that since melting of perma-frost ice was never witnessed before. She claims that these ice blocks melting owing to human activities such as excessive use of fossil fuel. She believes that the sea level is rapidly increasing and the rate at which it is increasing is alarming.
In conclusion it can be said that it is a debatable topic and both the sides will find it difficult to find a common ground.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52012383901 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26608891447 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46439628483 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6625109874 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.2367328918 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.