Both the passage and lecture is discussing about the common beliefs about elephants. Keeping this in mind, the author introduces tree dominant beliefs about the giant creature. The lecturer, on contrary, disapproves the beliefs and explains that they do not have scientific basis and accordingly provides three interpretations for the misunderstood beliefs.
First, both the reading and speaking materials argue elephant’s ability in faithfully recognizing their death time. In this vein, the writer states that the animals know the exact time of their death and when they get old they get separated apart from their hard and go near water and die there where public call it as "elephant graveyards". The lecturer, however, opposes the claim by calling it misunderstanding and illustrates that old elephants go to adjacent water to feed the soft grasses due to disability in chewing and their broken teeth. Consequently, their death happens around water nearby.
Second, the both passage and lecture explain the painting ability of elephants. Having this in mind, the writer asserts that the creature have object recognition ability which helps to draw or paint different objects such as flowers and other elephants and etc. Conversely, the professor refutes the assertion by demonstrating that the animal does not understand how to pain an object, however, it just reacts to the strokes of its trainer. People who train an elephant to draw would stroke the creature's ear and it provokes them to draw a line and they just to learn how to draw certain patterns by the tricky training method.
Eventually, the both text and speech illustrate elephants fear of Mince. Accordingly, the author states the animals do scare mice. Oppositely, the professor calls in misinterpretation and explains that elephants do not scare the small creature, however, they just are not familiar with them and it makes them to escape from the possible threatening. To more clarification, she adds that the elephants which are living in zoo do not afraid of the tiny creature because they are familiar with them.
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 80
- TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task 88
- TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task 90
- TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task 90
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...cts such as flowers and other elephants and etc. Conversely, the professor refutes the a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'creatures'' or 'creature's'?
Suggestion: creatures'; creature's
...in an elephant to draw would stroke the creatures ear and it provokes them to draw a line...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27678571429 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94871694445 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4234685826 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.