Integrated writing – TPO24

Essay topics:

Integrated writing – TPO24

The lecturer believes that the memoir written by Chevalier is quite correct and takes an instance for its plausibility which is just opposite to the statement drawn from the passage.

Firstly, the lecturer says that the author was wealthy. The evidence for his wealthy needless to be judge by the fact of loan from the switch merchant. Due to the party in Venice, he had probably lost him all money; furthermore, the reason for more time to convert the property to the money, he may have borrowed money from the merchant.

Secondly, the reading states that it is faulty as they questioned on how he can remember all the quotes of the conversation he had with the writer. However, the speaker provides the evidence of his note-writing habit just after the conversation with the writer and its used during memoir to counter the point.

Lastly, contrary to the reading, the lecturer shows the reality of the incident of escape from the jail of Venice. The speaker question that if bribery was the reason for his escape other people in the jail also posses the high social status why did not they escape as well. Apart from that, the speaker asked if he had not broken the jail on his own as in his memoir why old document in the Venice says that they had repaired the ceiling just after his escape from the prison.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-31 joyce05 75 view
2023-12-11 Apolytos 70 view
2023-12-10 Apolytos 70 view
2023-12-10 Apolytos 70 view
2023-12-10 Apolytos 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user shrijan :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63247863248 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3300632983 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534188034188 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0089154406 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0391308967837 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0186890114428 0.0996497079465 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00438849137149 0.0662205650399 7% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0249949602287 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00387454807305 0.0443174109184 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.