It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Even though a five-day working schedule have been existed for a long time, some other proposals regarding to workdays arrangement are been talked about: either to work three days a week with long working hours each day, or a five-day work with less time for leisure and relaxition. When facing these two options, the latter is definitely more preferable for me for the following reasons.
The primary reason is that working five days a week, instead of three days, reap benefits to the health of people, including physical health and mental health. Initially, by working five days a week but with shorter rest time, a regular routine suitable for the body can be set, and a regular lifestyle is an indespensible element to keep healthy; in contrast, working for long hours each day usually lead to feelings of diziness and exhaustion, causing headaches and other choronical pains. In addition, a five-day working schedule reduces stress levels. To be more specific, To have five days for working means to have less workload each day, so there is no need to worry about the coming deadlines, which by contrast, could probably bring about too much pressure if all these tasks had to be done in three days.
What's also worth mentioning is that not only a five-day working plan are better for one's healthy, but it also benefits the companies in terms of working efficiency improvement by making less mistakes and save more time. First, people who work five days are less likely to make errors. To assign projects and tasks into five days means that there is more time for employees to check for errors and reflect on their daily work; this advantage, however, can hardly be gained if a three-day working plan is adopted, because as discussed before, people who work long hours are under a lot of streess, thus the possibility of making mistakes increases. Furthermore, for working people, the less average hours people work each day, the more time they can save on correcting those mistakes, increasing working efficiency. Instead, how could it be possible for people who work only three days a week to make no mistakes and to maintain working performances?
In sum, the option of a five-day working plan is much more reasonable because it is better for both the emplyee and the company.
- Television advertising directed toward young children(aged two to five) should not be allowed. 76
- One can know a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has. 90
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 71
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 85
- Some school require children(5-11岁) to work together instead of working on their own during most of their learning process， do you agree or disagree that is the best way to teach children？ 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal health and mental health. Initially, by working five days a week but with sho...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d probably bring about too much pressure if all these tasks had to be done in thr...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... tasks had to be done in three days. Whats also worth mentioning is that not only ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...orking efficiency improvement by making less mistakes and save more time. First, peo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to check for errors and reflect on their daily work; this advantage, however, can...
^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... streess, thus the possibility of making mistakes increases. Furthermore, for wor...
^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... plan is much more reasonable because it is better for both the emplyee and the c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 389.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89460154242 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50848376469 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506426735219 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.8074764675 49.2860985944 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.666666667 110.228320801 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4166666667 21.698381199 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449758591424 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209182212418 0.0996497079465 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683601393605 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316482856773 0.162205337803 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735997606111 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.