The reading and the lecture are both about edmontosaurs and if they migrated in South during cold and dark days. The author of the reading feels that edmontosaurs, survived the winter by moving to south. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that the edmontosaurs’s evidences are not convincing.
To begin with, the author argues that the edmontosaurs’ diet habit was plants. The article mentions that if they eat food in winter they should migrate the other area, This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims the edmontosaurs did not need to migrate the other area. Additionally, he says the edmontosaurs eat dead plant, so they do not have to find food.Moreover, the lecturer says that during summer the dinousaurs already ate a lot of plants and those were enough to survive.
Secondly, the writer suggests the edmontosaurs lived in herd. The article says that such as caribou and buffalo, live and migrate in herd because migration helps animals to coordinate. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning they did not migrate even they are found in herd. Additionally, they were in herd because they were protecting each other. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that for example, Roosevelt Elk: they move in herd but they did not migrate.
Finally, the author posits that the edmontosaurs can migrate because they can travel for long kilometers. Moreover, it is stated in the article that they can run very fast, reaching speeds up to 45 kilometers per hour. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is the kid edmontosaurs can not run fast, move to warmer climate during the harsh article winter. The juveniles could not survive by themselves.
- People work because they need money to live What are some other reasons that people work Discuss one or more of these reasons Use specific examples and details to support your answer 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Physical exercise is more important to older people than to younger people 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style and
- In many countries plastic containers have become more common than ever and are used by many food and drink companies Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...survived the winter by moving to south. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...plant, so they do not have to find food.Moreover, the lecturer says that during summer t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10452961672 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95238140928 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2920922338 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1764705882 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0317960077485 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0120051492286 0.0996497079465 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0174243825295 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0221229311748 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103589495183 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.