In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.
Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to "shine", to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team's overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
The reading and the lecture are both about whether working in group is beneficial or not. The author of the reading thinks that it is advantageous and provides various examples of it. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. he is of the opinion that working in team is have some ill effects.
To begin with, the author argues that working in a team is helpful for a team member. The article mentions that by working with people of different domains one get a chance to gather more knowledge and learn more skills. this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. he claims that in such organization many members get a free time. Additionally, he says that such members without even contributing are able to get recognition for their work because of which the real contributors have opposite attitude towards the idea of team work.
Secondly, the writer suggests that team projects are usually completed very quickly and creatively. In the article it is said that as project is developed by various experts showing celerity in their work make the project gets finished on time. Along with this, a team is able to make project having many innovative features because by working in team, a member's risk taking ability increases. The lecturer, however rebuts this by mentioning that rather the project completion rate is delayed by working in team. he elaborates on this by bringing up the point that it becomes very difficult to reach a consensus and due to repeated meetings more time is spent on making decisions rather than actual work.
Finally, the author posits that such a structure of doing work can be rewarding for the members. Moreover, in the article it is stated that the decision maker will feel better in this way because he will now be able to voice his thoughts. There would be higher chances of getting recognition as by working in team the outcomes will be more far-reaching, which cannot be possible if a person is working in alone. In contrast, the lecturer' position is that working in team creates discord among members as some of them become influencers in the team and convince many of them to follow their line of thought and if anyone argues he is immediately shunned by the other members of the team. however, if any failure occurred in the project then the complete team is blamed for the debacle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | supergirl20 | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | bishoy | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | fofty | 60 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | aldovega0516 | 3 | view |
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 76
- The people we work with have many different characteristics and all of them affect the quality of our time at work. Of the following, what do you think is the most important quality for a boss or supervisor to have? -a serious attitude about their work-a 71
- Loyalty is the most important quality in choosing a friend 90
- The people we work with have many different characteristics and all of them affect the quality of our time at work. Of the following, what do you think is the most important quality for a boss or supervisor to have? -a serious attitude about their work-a 70
- people have a lot of opinions about the value of higher education. which do you think is the most important reason to attend college or university?1.new experience 2.career preparation 3.increased knowledge 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...us and provides various examples of it. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...hallenges the claim made by the author. he is of the opinion that working in team ...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...r more knowledge and learn more skills. this specific argument is challenged by the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...argument is challenged by the lecturer. he claims that in such organization many m...
^^
Line 9, column 514, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ion rate is delayed by working in team. he elaborates on this by bringing up the p...
^^
Line 13, column 688, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...unned by the other members of the team. however, if any failure occurred in the project...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 30.3222958057 188% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1373.03311258 142% => OK
No of words: 405.0 270.72406181 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82716049383 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56690864007 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 145.348785872 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498765432099 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 419.366225166 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8248150225 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.894736842 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155005899235 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053656085729 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446789385249 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957678594139 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319547938765 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.