The article and the lecture are about the possibility to keep a permanent human presence on Venus which unlike on Mars or the Moon, seems to be unlike. The author in the passage believes that there are some negative conditions on Venus that make it inhospitable. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the statements made in the reading. She thinks that there practical solutions that help overcome these conditions.
First, the author claims that due to the atmospheric pressure is greater on Venus than on Earth, it is improbable to send humans to Venus which also implies that most of the spacecraft will crash to surface. Nevertheless, this claim is challenged by the lecturer who posits that the creation of a station above 50 kilometers of the Venus’ surface can be a practical solution because in this area the atmospheric pressure is as low as at Earth.
Second, the article states that the lack of water and oxygen on Venu’s atmosphere will make impossible to create settlements on it. Furthermore, the author exposes that this atmosphere is mainly made up of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid and the presence of water vapor is scattered. Nonetheless, the lecturer discredits this idea by explaining that due to the presence of these elements, it is possible to convert them into water and oxygen by chemical processes which clearly are easier than transporting eater and oxygen from the Earth.
Finally, the author mentions that because most of the sunlight is reflected in Venus by thin clouds, it is difficult to have access to electricity for powering space machines and equipment. The lecturer, on the other hand, puts forth the idea that the creation of the station on Venus can absorb the energy reflected from the surface and also the little amount of energy that reached into the surface can be used to collect energy for the equipment.
- The article and the lecture are about coal ash, which is the waste of power plants, and its effect into the environment consequently, it is suggested that new regulations must be incorporated to the process of energy. The author in the passage believes th 80
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 61
- People behavior has changed over time. Many years ago, young people used to obey rules from their parents but this dependence has changed. Currently, students make decisions by themselves without consulting opinions from other. Therefore, I personally bel 76
- Friendships are considered to be the most important aspect of your entire life. There are different opinions about these relationships. Some people prefer having a lot of friends for a short period of time while others prefer having a small number of frie 70
- Undoubtedly, technology has changed our lives in several ways. One of the most important advances has been in terms of communication. Currently, people have the facility to be aware of what is happening worldwide. Therefore, I personally believe that is i 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98407643312 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71611244727 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.9608609662 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.272727273 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200271697472 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728604660193 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080084354796 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119212765547 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617431501008 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.