Many universities have begun shifting their focus away from research and toward better teaching methods. However, a number of reasons exist which suggest that this research is essential for universities to function properly.
The reading and lecture both discuss about that effective teaching methods is more important than research or not. The reading points out it is better to universities focus on researching, However the professor rejects this clam and believes it’s essential to have effective method of teaching.
The reading firstly says university rankings are based on researches, Also the rankings play a key role for colleges or universities to have a higher ranking Hence, by having higher rank, more students will come. However, the lecture points out nowadays raking is concern by teaching too.
Additionally, the reading points out the professors are known by context and experts. However, the lecture says it’s better to studies be more accessible and understandable for the average of people. Also the quality is more important than the quantity.
Eventually, the reading beck on professors can have a better ability to teach when they research on various of topics. On the other hand, the woman points out the ability to teach is not related to research Also, she knows a teacher that research very professional but he or she can’t present as well.
In conclusion, the reading stands that for faculties and universities research has more advantages, But the lecture stands on the opposite side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: IT_IS[22]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (short form of 'it is')?
Suggestion: its
...rofessor rejects this clam and believes it’s essential to have effective method of t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o have effective method of teaching. The reading firstly says university ranking...
^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...derstandable for the average of people. Also the quality is more important than the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, so, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77242898768 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.994795642 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237134934153 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919104995257 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696974866531 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135527985768 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683282653531 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.