This material addresses the question of the constant decline of the yellow cedar in the northern part of America during the last century. The reading passage suggests three main reasons that are responsible for killing the trees.
This material addresses the question of the constant decline of the yellow cedar in the northern part of America during the last century. The reading passage suggests three main reasons that are responsible for killing the trees. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that the real causes of the issue under consideration have not /yet/ been identified.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that insect parasites may be the reason of the decline of the trees. This is due to the observed instances of the insects' negative impact on the yellow cedars. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that cedar tress contain chemicals poisonous for inspects, and that only the trees that are already damaged might be attacked by insects.
Additionally, the article posits that brown bears might be cause of the problem, since they eat the cedar bark rich with sugar. However, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, he mentions that populations of the yellow cedar decline even on the northern islands, where there are no bears. Consequently, the bears' habit is not the cause of the problem under consideration.
Finally, the author suggests that the alteration in time when the trees' roots are growing at present and, specifically the cold weather that harms the roots is one of the explanations of the fact. The listening passage states, though, that more harsh weather conditions in other places and their impact on the plants undermine the validity of the proposed theory.
- This material addresses the question of survival of dinosaurs in the north of Alaska during its cold and dark winters. The reading passage suggests that dinosaurs migrated south to stay alive. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by s 80
- Written paragraph:In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is toassemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offersseveral advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider rang 80
- TPO 34Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “When people succeed, it is entirely because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with their success.” Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 70
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a travel guide 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...e article posits that brown bears might be cause of the problem, since they eat the ceda...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bears'' or 'bear's'?
Suggestion: bears'; bear's
...e there are no bears. Consequently, the bears habit is not the cause of the problem u...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, may, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16796875 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61023739024 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4240773763 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42438404802 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142787174442 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203538130644 0.0662205650399 307% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241151064339 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.257571729639 0.0443174109184 581% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.