mentioned in the reading, and provides some evidence to the contrary.
The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about pterosaurs. The reading claims that pterosaurs were not capable of flying by pointing out three supporting reasons. The professor, on the other hand, repudiates whatever mentioned in the reading, and provides some evidence to the contrary.
First, the reading states that pterosaurs could not fly, owing to the fact that they were cold-blooded like the other reptiles, and they had a slow metabolism, so they did not have enough energy to fly. However, the professor denies it, saying that according to some fossils, researchers found out that pterosaurs had dense hair on their body. She mentions that warm-blooded animals have hair on their body to preserve against harsh cold weather. Therefore, pterosaurs like warm-blooded animals had a sufficient metabolism which enabled them to produce a lot of energy.
Second, the passage claims that pterosaur was too large, and their large body prevented them from flying. The professor, nevertheless, refuses the author's view and illustrates the idea that pterosaurs had hollow bones. As a result, despite the size of their body, they had lightweight; so they were light enough, which enabled them to fly by flapping their wings.
Third, the author discusses that pterosaurs had small and weak legs, so they could not take off and launch themselves to the air. On the contrary, the professor disagrees with this idea by clarifying that pterosaurs were different from birds. Because birds only use two legs to take off from the earth, however, pterosaurs used four limbs to push themselves from the ground. Thus, they could run fast enough and could jump high to make them fly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-09 | mhp1234 | 3 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | mhp1234 | view | |
| 2023-07-23 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-13 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | sonyeoso | 3 | view |
- •18. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 70
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why? - An organization that provides food and housing to people i 73
- By and large, it is established beyond doubt that in modern cities, people are facing a myriad of 73
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' job. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The main idea of both the passage and th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... pointing out three supporting reasons. The professor, on the other hand, repudiate...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovides some evidence to the contrary. First, the reading states that pter...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...led them to produce a lot of energy. Second, the passage claims that pterosau...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them to fly by flapping their wings. Third, the author discusses that pterosa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, as to, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1268115942 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60370648108 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4698592437 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116726858352 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056439495443 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156668074573 0.0662205650399 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101917250132 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139184457299 0.0443174109184 314% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.