The reading and the lecture are both about the first inhabitants of New Zealand. Where are the reading suggests that the first inhabitants of New Zealand move there around 1300 C.E, the lecturer states that there might be a possibility that people would have been living before 1300 C.E. The lecturer casts doubt on main points of the reading by providing three arguments.
Firstly, according to the reading, there is an evidence that the Maori people originated there around 1300 C.E. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that New Zealand is majorly comprised of European descendants as well as a small amount of Maori people. So, as the British People are in majority they should have been there before the Maori's. Furthermore, there is an evidence that the British people were the first ones to arrive, and that too before 1300.C.E
Secondly, the reading states that, as trees were replaced by grass during 1300 C.E., it would have been because of forest fires. This gives evidence of human origin. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this point. He states that natural conditions can also cause forest fires. In addition to this, he says that reduced rainfall or drought can cause such forest fires. Hence, it is not right to conclude that forest fires were caused by humans during 1300 C.E.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the first inhabitants of New Zealand, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t the first inhabitants of New Zealand. Where are the reading suggests that the first...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: E
...of New Zealand move there around 1300 C.E, the lecturer states that there might b...
^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...well as a small amount of Maori people. So, as the British People are in majority they...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...nes to arrive, and that too before 1300.C.E Secondly, the reading states that,...
^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: E
...s to arrive, and that too before 1300.C.E Secondly, the reading states that, a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01593625498 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39500228308 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486055776892 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.9676175241 49.2860985944 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.06452816374 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.070170701273 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317289455063 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265637230263 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504975315574 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253089681396 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.