Normally, professors are teaching in campus, but there are quite a few professors on television. The passage claims that television appearances greatly benefit professors, universities, and public. However, the lecture states that there is a great harm to professors, universities, and the public.
Normally, professors are teaching in campus, but there are quite a few professors on television. The passage claims that television appearances greatly benefit professors, universities, and public. However, the lecture states that there is a great harm to professors, universities, and the public.
The lecture disagrees with the passage’s claim that professors’ appearing on TV benefits them. It may seem that the professor’s reputation and importance is increasing, but it actually turns out that the professor is losing reputation according to the academia’s view, because the professor will be academically labeled as an “unserious scholar”, according to the lecture. As a result, the professor will be less likely to be invited to conference meetings, thus losing the chance of getting funding that is necessary for further research.
Secondly, a professor being a regular guest in television shows may not increase the reputation of their university, but oppositely damage the university. Being on TV greatly improves the reputation of the university, which leads to the increase of funding given to the school. But, professors being on television are a large waste of time, causing the time on campus to decrease. So, professors being on television are a great damage to their university.
Lastly, the passage and the lecture hold different views on whether the public benefits from television appearance. The television doesn’t want an educational lecture, but rather wanting an educational title. This leads to the show being less serious and academic. Plus, the television only wants the reputation of the professor, not the knowledge.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should give primary school students aged 5 10 no more than 30 minutes homework because they ve already got enough instructions from school in the days 60
- Normally professors are teaching in campus but there are quite a few professors on television The passage claims that television appearances greatly benefit professors universities and public However the lecture states that there is a great harm to profes 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should give primary school students aged 5 10 no more than 30 minutes homework because they ve already got enough instructions from school in the days 60
- Anting 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great damage'.
Suggestion: great damage
... So, professors being on television are a great damage to their university. Lastly, the pass...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55511811024 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16187815941 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515748031496 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.1421503912 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471783070179 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18474390424 0.0996497079465 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11906857861 0.0662205650399 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315245060307 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169903499984 0.0443174109184 383% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.