Now listen to a part of a lecture on the topic you just read about.Asteroid colonization is not a very practical idea. Each of the points in the reading has a serious downside.First, while low gravity on an asteroid would make landing and taking off relat

The author in the reading mainly discusses three benefits of asteroid colonization. However, the professor in the listening rebuts them because they are not practical.

First, the reading claims that low gravity of an asteroid would make the landing and taking off relatively easy, which is refuted in the listening because low-gravity environments also present certain risks. In a low-gravity environment, people start losing muscle mass and their bone density becomes lower. Even astronauts accustomed to low-gravity environments suffer from health problems.

Second, according to the reading material, mining on asteroids would be profitable, but the lecturer tells us that it is not the whole picture. Additional factors should be considered. For example, the costs of supporting a colony and of transporting metals are likely to be high and will reduce the profits. And there is no guarantee that the price of the metals will remain the same. If metals are mined in large quantities, it would increase the supply of them, which could end up lower in the market price.

Lastly, based on the third theory in reading, some asteroids are easy to reach, but the listening argues that they may not be easy to return from because asteroid orbits can be unusual. Some orbital paths come close to earth, but then move away from earth, often a great distance away from earth.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, third, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16071428571 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65369399832 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.409250159 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243423906406 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774191587866 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105897854886 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135711656852 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915123035267 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.