Over the last few decades, there has been a warming trend across the globe. Many view this perceived pattern of increasing temperatures as unnatural and a result of the surge in carbon emissions produced by industrialized nations. Though some may debate the possible causes, one fact is certain: we are experiencing a global warming. The evidence for this is clear.
First, data from sophisticated instruments across the globe indicate a warming trend. Throughout the world, thermometers from weather stations on the surface of the Earth take readings of the temperature. These instruments have kept detailed records of temperature changes for over a century. The average of the temperatures recorded by all of these instruments plotted over time indicates that there is a general warming occurring across the globe.
Also, secondary evidence points to rising temperatures. For one, scientists have reported an alarming rate of breaks in the ice shelves of Antarctica. Specifically, a recent break of a reportedly 53 mile long and 40 mile wide iceberg. This unusually high number of icebergs calved from Antarctica in recent years has prompted many to see the reality of global warming, since excessive warming would cause the ice in Antarctica to become weak and break as it has.
Third, impartial, unbiased organizations such as respected newspapers and international organizations have considered the evidence and accepted as fact the idea that there is a warming trend. For example, major newspapers published part of a United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) climate report expressing grave concern over global warming. The report states that the climate has warmed over the last 50 years and that computer models predict an astounding 10-degree increase in the next 100 years with severe consequences for life on Earth.
The article claims that we are currently experienced global warming and provides three reasons of support. HOwever, the professor states that there is no conclusive proof that raising temp are really exist. He refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the article provides evidences that the globe is warming from data collected from very innovative instruments like thermometers. The professor refutes this point by explaining that not all thermometers across the world are well-maintained. He adds that if we just eliminated reports from thermometers that poorly controlled and maintained, the data collected from US and Europe thermometers instruments, which are highly maintained, shows that the temperature have not risen since 1979.
Second, the reading avers that ice breaks that happened in the Antarctica could have been a result from elevated the global’s temperature. On the other hand, the professor explains that this point is flawed because it fails to mentioned that the earth has exposed to both warm and cooling temperatures. Also, the real reason for ice shelves breaks could be caused by unnatueal and non warming related.
Third, the articles states that some well-known organizations and newspapers have shared their concern about global warming issue, such as UNEP climate report that express their worrying about global warming, and predict the Earth’s temperture for the next 100 years. Yet, the professor demonstrate his feelings by saying that this point is the most irresponsible evidence. UNEP reports have published by newspaper before the evidences are evaluated, so this report is not acceptable and it should not informed to the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-26 | toeflibt.ara | 86 | view |
| 2016-12-26 | toeflibt.ara | 3 | view |
| 2016-12-26 | toeflibt.ara | 3 | view |
| 2016-02-15 | saramhl | 80 | view |
| 2014-06-18 | Wafaa | 80 | view |
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 76
- ZOOS 60
- x 3
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 73
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...sive proof that raising temp are really exist. He refutes each of the author's r...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstruments, which are highly maintained, shows that the temperature have not rise...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d because it fails to mentioned that the earth has exposed to both warm and cooli...
^^
Line 7, column 508, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'inform'
Suggestion: inform
...ort is not acceptable and it should not informed to the public.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, second, so, third, well, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55212355212 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91762141496 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4769039739 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.833333333 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848802444745 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030708969311 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0186794516407 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047467659022 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187905912742 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.