The passage and lecture are both disscusing uses of great house of Chaco canyon settelments. The writer claims three possible uses of these houses. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article. He says these suggestive uses are unsupportive.
First, the author states, these houses were using as residential. He says Chaco structrs are similar to large apartements. The lectere in the other hand refutes this statement. He pointsto abcence of fireplace in Chaco house mean that, these houses did not use for livind, because people need fireplace for cooking. Furthermore, large romms indicate, these houses had many hundered of people.
Seconde, the reading passage claims, Caco Canyon used as storge to save food and prevent it from spoiling. This argument is rebutted by professor. He contents, these houses had container which were uncoverd and small which my spilt the food and spoiled it.
Finally, the author mentions, these houses used as ceremonial centers. many mound formed from old material like broken pots were found as evedince that people gathered at Pueblo Alto for ceremonies. This point is challenged by professor, He claims, there are many material excavated in thses houses, like constriction material. Moreover, presence of pots just only as a trash left by workers who worked in that houses, Not for ceremonies.
The passage and lecture are both disccusing uses of great house of Chaco canyon settelments. The writer claims three possible uses of these houses. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article. He says these suggestive uses are unsupportive.
First, the author states, these houses were using as redidential. He says Chaco structers are similar to large apartements. The lectere in the other hand refutes this statement. He pointsto abcence of fireplace in Chaco house mean that, these houses did not use for livind, because people need fireplace for cooking. Furthermore, large romms indicate, these houses had many hundered of people.
Seconde, the reading passage claims, Caco Canyon used as storge to save food and prevent it from spoiling. This argument is rebutted by professor. He contents, these houses had container which were uncoverd and small which my spilt the food and spoiled it.
Finally, the author mentions, these houses used as ceremonial centers. many mound formed from old material like broken pots were found as evedince that people gathered at Pueblo Alto for ceremonies. This point is challenged by professor, He claims, there are many material excavated in thses houses, like constriction material. Moreover, presence of pots just only as a trash left by workers who worked in that houses, Not for ceremonies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-17 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
- The reading passage and the lecture are both about eco certification of wood companies in United State The author claims three reasons to explain why these certification not important for wood companies in United State However the lecturer casts doubt on 78
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about comuterize smart cars The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars However the professor casts doubt on claim made in article She believes using computerize cars is not clear bene 78
- The reading passage and lecture are both about online encyclopedias The authors claim a several problems of online encyclopedias that make them less valuble than traditional printed type The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles She states non of 73
- Education process is a crucial part bin kids live This is due to its influence on their future life Good level of education mean a excellent chance to get dream career when kids grow up The controversial is whether educating children consider more difficu 70
- The reading and lecture about the possibilty of life on venus The author believes that there it is imposible to live on venus The lecturer casts doubts on claims made in the arlicle he sayes we can find life on venus if we do flooting station on it first 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both disccus...
^^
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ms three possible uses of these houses. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in th...
^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...hese houses used as ceremonial centers. many mound formed from old material like bro...
^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun mound seems to be countable; consider using: 'many mounds'.
Suggestion: many mounds
...hese houses used as ceremonial centers. many mound formed from old material like broken po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun material seems to be countable; consider using: 'many materials'.
Suggestion: many materials
...nged by professor, He claims, there are many material excavated in thses houses, like constri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23148148148 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5775356421 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 3.25607064018 369% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7125763696 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.625 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489981220459 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167564160701 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149966092793 0.0662205650399 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325716890782 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.273285583646 0.0443174109184 617% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.