The passage claims that the population of birds is decreasing in the United States because of using pesticide by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that the mentioned theories in the passage are unconvincing and refutes each of the author's reasons.
The passage claims that the population of birds is decreasing in the United States because of using pesticide by pointing out three reasons for support. The lecture, on the other hand, states that the mentioned theories in the passage are unconvincing and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the writer goes on to mention that natural habitats of birds will be destroyed as the human population and settlements expanding. On the contrary, the professor rejects this by explaining that the growing human population and expanding rural areas provide better and larger habitats for some species of birds like penguins. Therefore, the population of some birds will diminish, hence, others will grow. Growing in population of some special kinds of birds also is beneficial for their predators and bring them an available source of food, which leads to expanding their population.
Furthermore, the reading argues that the growing human population will increase agricultural activities, which could transfer some part of natural habitats into areas that use for agriculture. Conversely, the professor supports an opposite view as compared to that presented in the passage; he describes that with the introduction of new crops and more variety of them, less and less areas will be used for agriculture every year.
Finally, the author explains that chemical pesticides, which use of them increase with expanding in human settlement, will poisoned insects and contaminated drink water and enter into the food chain for birds. The speaker, in contrast, rejects the author's view and illustrates the idea that nowadays people are more aware of using pesticides. As a result, two changes have occurred: new pesticide are inventing which is not harmful to nature and growing trends which leads to growing pest resistance crops.
- The passage claims that the box shaped device will not be prosperously interacted by desertification by pointing out three reasons for support The lecture on the other hand states that the reasons which proposed against the use of the box shaped device ar 45
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- The passage claims that increasing salt level in lake's water, which makes it hard for birds and fishes to go on living there and would transform the lake into a dead zone, would be solved the trend which is harmful to the lake's health by point 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 76
Comments
英国论文代写机构拥有灵活的服务模式和良好的客户支持体系…
英国论文代写机构拥有灵活的服务模式和良好的客户支持体系，能够为客户提供及时有效的帮助，让客户感受到专业、高效的服务体验。提供各种类型的作业、论文和其他学术文献的定制服务，以满足客户的个性化需求。https://www.lxws.net/ukdaixie.html
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun areas is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rops and more variety of them, less and less areas will be used for agriculture ever...
^^^^
Line 13, column 124, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'poison'
Suggestion: poison
...ith expanding in human settlement, will poisoned insects and contaminated drink water an...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, so, therefore, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36551724138 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72111573955 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1423652076 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.454545455 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330828539595 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151796358774 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.219245131666 0.0662205650399 331% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282278158449 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.347834401281 0.0443174109184 785% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.