In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future
The advent of technology and new business patterns sheds light on the booming of myriad new occupations, which leads to the uncertainty in defining which jobs to be viable in this day and age. I assure that this phenomenon emerged is due to the higher number of careers and the governmental control in business operations.
Admittedly, sorting out secure and stable jobs in the present time is much tiring owing to the grandiose figure of jobs. It is true that almost all governments in the world currently welcome the business of multinational companies and giant corporations in their countries, which benefits the labor markets. Furthermore, with the technological innovations, several new-formed jobs such as graphic designers, data analysts or account managers are created. These positions are strange with most of the elderly who customarily ascertain that only subsistence wage will be offered. As a result, the soaring number of newly-added occupations has challenged people in making a good prediction as to which one is secure while it requires only a simple guess in the past.
Furthermore, the difference in the business control of the government has made the selection for secure and successful jobs turn arduous at present. A conventional belief rooted at length signifies that working in the government's companies could support workers with pension and fringe benefits. These two elements were needed to find out whether a certain job was stable or not in the past when a good job was defined as the fixed payment gained monthly despite any unexpected situations happening. However, the story turns out differently in today's business market where the government intervention is not absolutely fierce. It is conspicuous that employees' payroll is now carried out by their employers who can generously offer handsome payment depending on the job responsibilities. In the modern epoch, a construction worker, for example, can receive up to 15 million VND while a blue-collar worker earns only a third of the former's salary, which makes the previous criteria obsolete and inapplicable.
By way of conclusion, there seems to be easier to declare which career is potential to follow in the past than these days.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-11 | tamle | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | saeedpanahi | 81 | view |
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 78
- As parts of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its knowledge and cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...solutely fierce. It is conspicuous that employees payroll is now carried out by their emp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 931, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'formers'' or 'former's'?
Suggestion: formers'; former's
...collar worker earns only a third of the formers salary, which makes the previous criter...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, third, while, as to, for example, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1373.03311258 137% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27247191011 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01427792643 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 145.348785872 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60393258427 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4028374923 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.071428571 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165115556045 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050934620381 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494506629506 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976993514928 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023507496211 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 63.6247240618 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.