pateint records in medical
The reading and the lecturer are both about the medical records which are stored in either electronic data bases or paper base in the hospitals. The author believes that electronic base records are very easy and convenient. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in article. He says that doctors need to keep records in paper still they have electronic records.
First of all, the author claims that electronic records help to save money, because there is no need for space to keep records, and they are easy to transfer and copy. This point is challenged by lecturer; he says that for the legal reason doctors need to keep paper based data, because in paper data there is signature of doctor so it is important. Moreover, doctors keep back up plan in case of emergency. So, they keep paper data still they have electronic record.
Secondly, the author states that electronic base data prevents errors like improper writing or unorganized data, so it may leads to dangerous consequences. The lecturer rebuts this argument and suggests that doctors still need to paper and pen for note down the medical history of patient. He elaborates on this by mentioning that assistance of doctor copy the history in computer later on after finishing the whole procedures.
Thirdly, the author mentions that electronic records are helpful in research aid, because it is impossible to study whole data from the thousands of papers. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that use of electric data in research work is very complicated. He admits that now it is compulsory to take permission of patient before include his data in research work. Patient can block his data anytime, so this is a very difficult procedure.
- various reasons to attend university 66
- Hill pellets in United States 75
- If a person to whom you know wants to move to your city. What you think that what will be his liking and disliking. 60
- select a person to teach others based oneducationqualities of previous workexperience 60
- children should know about financier management 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e records are very easy and convenient. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de in article. He says that doctors need to keep records in paper still they hav...
^^
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ors need to keep records in paper still they have electronic records. First...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...still they have electronic records. First of all, the author claims that ele...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s no need for space to keep records, and they are easy to transfer and copy. This...
^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ors like improper writing or unorganized data, so it may leads to dangerous conse...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fter finishing the whole procedures. Thirdly, the author mentions that electr...
^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compulsory to take permission of patient before include his data in research work...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so this is a very difficult procedure.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96193771626 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53588604299 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491349480969 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7897382407 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118109256645 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478958661553 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561132402909 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822305576189 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614034413028 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.