The peregrine falcon is an iconic species of bird known for its impressive hunting abilities and aerial acrobatics These birds are found on every continent except Antarctica but their populations have declined in some areas due to a variety of factors Her

Essay topics:

The peregrine falcon is an iconic species of bird known for its impressive hunting abilities and aerial acrobatics. These birds are found on every continent except Antarctica, but their populations have declined in some areas due to a variety of factors. Here are three ways to increase peregrine falcon populations.

First, we can protect nesting sites. Peregrine falcons require specific types of nesting sites in order to reproduce successfully. These sites are often found on cliffs or tall buildings, and can be disrupted or destroyed by human activities such as construction or development. It is possible to work with landowners or developers to protect these sites from destruction or disturbances. By protecting these sites, we can help ensure that peregrine falcons have the space they need to nest and raise their young.

Another method is to control the populations of predators of the falcons. Peregrine falcons are extremely vulnerable to predation, especially when they are young and unable to defend themselves. By controlling the populations of predators that prey on them, such as other birds of prey or mammals, we can help protect the falcons and increase their chances of survival. This could include using non-lethal methods such as deterrents or repellents to keep predators away. In some cases, it may also be necessary to relocate predators to areas where they are less likely to come into contact with peregrine falcons.

Finally, we can rehabilitate injured or sick falcons. Peregrine falcons can become injured or sick due to a variety of reasons, including pollution, disease, or human interference. By rehabilitating these birds and releasing them back into the wild, we can help boost peregrine falcon populations and give them a second chance at life.

Both the reading and a lecture are about prevention and eradication of a decease called QDS. While the article provides some useful ideas, like detection, health promotion and an insects reduction approach, professor shares his concerns.

Reading passage proposes to develop a proper detection of the bacteria which causes such a decease in the first place. For example, by establishing early the endangered trees, we can stop further spreading by removing such plants and burning them down. While lecturer supports the argument that such a system has some potential, he casts doubt that it would be capable to commit much to help resolve this issue. First of all, as the area to perform inspections proposed in the reading is quite large, detection can’t be effective enough. Secondly, there are signs of infection which are not available for the visual inspection.

Then article examines how the commitment to the health promotion of olives can beat the QDS. As trees have a natural immune system that is capable of overcoming decease if irrigation and nutrition are ensured, it could be helpful to provide such plants with good conditions of living in order to prevent them from destruction. Professor, on the other hand, states that such a process would cost much money and casts doubt that it will work in the first place.

Finally, using chemicals to influence the spread of such an illness is another possible method according to the reading. Professor supports that this idea might work but he continues to share his concerns. He argues that such a technology is difficult to use. Moreover, this approach is based on battling bacteria when it’s to late, as professor elaborates on, because the bacteria has already endangered the plant, so it might be ineffective, not to mention that some insects are resistant to chemicals.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by user degew59415@eryod.com :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'insects'' or 'insect's'?
Suggestion: insects'; insect's
...like detection, health promotion and an insects reduction approach, professor shares hi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over, this approach is based on battling bacteria when it’s to late, as professor...
^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...s based on battling bacteria when it’s to late, as professor elaborates on, becau...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, first of all, in the first place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11589403974 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64528090646 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579470198675 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2068100961 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0417744204986 0.272083759551 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0144179080214 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0139512462894 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0266537629733 0.162205337803 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010415262189 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.