permanent human being on the venus
The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to impossibility of permanent human being residency on the Venus and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explain that it can be possible with flooding station and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading passage mention that atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than earth which makes travel to land to impossible due to they would be crushed under that amount of pressure. In contrary, the professor provides information that drawback that is related to pressure, might be overcome. He states that pressure level at 50 km up is equal the pressure on the earth, thus maintaining a flooding station in up sky will enable us to live there. Clearly, a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that higher level of Venus has lower pressures.
Second, the reading passage pushes forth the idea that there is no water reservoir as well as oxygen at Venus. Nonetheless, the professor contend this, since many compounds are present at Venus such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen so on, these chemicals may be processed to generate water and oxygen. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated.
Finally, the article posits that there is insufficient sun light due to thick cloud, minute of lights reach the ground at Venus. The professor refutes this points by explaining above 50 km, there are thin clouds so the flooding station can use more reflected sun light above and also below which can help to generate considerably electricity.
In summary, while both the reading and the lecture provides interesting information with regard to Venus, a significant amount of evidence support that article are presenting much more legitimate and tangible factors. Hence, the lecture fails to justify the claim toward stand point of scientist in the reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-15 | Rashed Bipu | 63 | view |
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged animal..... 80
- electronic medical record storage 86
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing TaskSome people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing thi 80
- A foreign visitor has only one day to spend in your country. Where should this visitor go on that day? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 80
- Why do you think some people are attract to dangerous sport or activities? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Nonetheless, the professor contend this, since many compounds are present at Venu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, thus, well, while, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19558359621 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75916878235 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593059936909 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0514907025 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228991818041 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731984127026 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097558569134 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1279997073 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112792680535 0.0443174109184 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.