Plastic bags
The lecturer is in favour the opinion concerning what article offered.
In the article it is stated, that across United States all groceries provide costumers with plastic bags. Despite the fact, that they cost not much, using them is connected to a huge amount of money for groceries. Furthermore, they bring a lot of damage. Reusable bags will reduce environmental waste and decrease usage of petroleum, that is main component in plastic bags.
The lecturer finds deeper and hiding results. The first argument to take into account is, that used plastic bags are thrown into the land or land field. It can cause serious damages to both, environment and animals. Moreover, it can take years plastic bag to decompose. Duration varies from 7 year to 1000 in rarely cases. Another key point he mentions is, that grocery stores use plastic bags daily, that causes increased fees. Moreover, costumers who are given 3-4 plastic bags at stores, do not use them in the future and throw majority. The most persuasive argument is, that plastic bags are composed with petroleum, that is not renewable source. By using reusable plastic bags, will be save a lot of petroleum. Lecturer states, that 1.6 billion petroleum is used to produce 360 billion plastic bags. Furthermore, he mentions, that this change will save millions of dollars.
All in all, by the points of view we can see that there are mainly disadvantages in using plastic bags.We can agree, that both article and lecturer take us to the decision, that by replacing plastic bags, environment will become more protected and huge amount of non-renewable source will be saved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | devvratjoshi | 3 | view |
| 2020-07-19 | mohammad9898 | 64 | view |
| 2018-11-17 | Gayane Tadevosyan | 73 | view |
| 2017-06-21 | mircxuna | 68 | view |
| 2017-06-21 | mircxuna | 71 | view |
- Plastic bags 68
- Plastic bags 71
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 76
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 84
- Reward system 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. The most persuasive argument is, that plastic bags are composed with petroleu...
^^
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sive argument is, that plastic bags are composed with petroleum, that is not ren...
^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing reusable plastic bags, will be save a lot of petroleum. Lecturer states, tha...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: We
...nly disadvantages in using plastic bags.We can agree, that both article and lectur...
^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., environment will become more protected and huge amount of non-renewable source ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0332103321 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54477743876 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564575645756 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 3.25607064018 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.088955052 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2352941176 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88235294118 7.06452816374 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399441803425 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136432736997 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135470002211 0.0662205650399 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194914733641 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158790272464 0.0443174109184 358% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.