The lecturer believes that conducting academic lectures on Television Shows would be sometimes good but it is mostly not beneficial to professors, universities and public. The reasons behind professor's disagreement is described as below.
First of all, the passage states that the professor will get more reputations if he appears on TV. However, the lecturer refutes this by providing examples of drawbacks. For example, the professor who appears on TV would not get reverance from their fellow professor as appearance on TV simply implies that he is more interested into getting public attention or fame and is not serious about his academic work. And because of this impression, the professor would not get enough money for his research or sometimes may not be invited to important conferences.
Secondly, the author of the text describes that the university will gain benefit if its professor will appear on TV. In contrast, the lecturer thinks that it would rather loss for the university as the professor will spend more time in preparing speaches for TV shows, traveling to that place, getting good looks, etc rather than devoting his precious time to teach university's students and research. Therefore, if the professor will not be able to present on campus then it should be count as university's loss.
Thirdly, the writter of the article believes that the public will get real expertise and insight by professor's lecture on TV. Notwithstanding, the speaker has different point of view about this argument. He thinks that the professor's lecture which would be stream on TV will have superficial details about new researches or new movie which is based on some literature work. Though, this details could be gathered by any TV journalist with some extra efforts.
\In sum, the passage describes three benefits of professor's appearance on TV, although, the lecturer provides counter arguments for all the ideas mentions in the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ersities and public. The reasons behind professors disagreement is described as below. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 486, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'counted'?
Suggestion: counted
... to present on campus then it should be count as universitys loss. Thirdly, the wr...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...which is based on some literature work. Though, this details could be gathered by any ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23248407643 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80999481041 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2251097686 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.357142857 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17209661157 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654411162775 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406175492163 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104222200587 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367218123785 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.