Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The main topic of both passage and the lecture is to discuss whether discovered vessels used as electric batteries in ancient time. The author argues that it not possible that these cylinders utilized as batteries, while the professor, on the contrast, not only refutes the author's claims but also points out that the reasons of the professor are not convincing, on a number of accounts elaborated upon here under.
To commence with, both the writer and the lecturer argues about an absence of wire or conductors. The author claims that there is no evidence that indicates some wires placed near these vessels. The professor contradicts this idea by asserting that these vessels discovered by some local people, not archeologist, thus they are not trained like an archeologist consider other things around these vessels to find some evidence of wire or conductors. Furthermore, she adds that it is possible the local people throw away some conductors or some things like wires.
In addition, both the author and the professor assert that archeologist found similar copper cylinders in the Seleucia, which they used this cylinder for holding scrolls of sacred texts. The professor, on the other hand, states that it is possible for ancient people used these vessels as the battery because they found the iron rod and some liquid inside these cylinders.
The last allegation of the author against which the professor discusses is that there is some application for the produced electricity. The writer says the electricity was useless for ancient people. The speaker claims that the ancient people could produce mild shocks using this vessel. Ancient doctors could convince other people that they could cure by the magical power of these devices. In fact, the ancient people might be used these vessels for healing. Indeed, the modern medicine used them for decrease pain and cure patients.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-milli 3
- Do you agree or disagree Rather than help children with their schoolwork parents should encourage their children do their work independently 64
- Do you agree or disagree The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than things that are practical 43
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 137, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...plication for the produced electricity. The writer says the electricity was useless...
^^^
Line 6, column 201, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tricity was useless for ancient people. The speaker claims that the ancient people ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, thus, while, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18241042345 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49539890023 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511400651466 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9235797522 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.642857143 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0342035095361 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0123907315918 0.0996497079465 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0153118061536 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0242910048812 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00936989833474 0.0443174109184 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.