Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. The vessels in ancient time
The reading and lecture are both about the vessels, which they can produce an electric current. The author of reading believes that the vessels could not use as electric batteries in ancient times. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that reading' reasons are inconceivable.
First of all, the author suggests that there is no evidence that can prove there were wires at that time because the vessels can just work with conductors such as wires. The statement is challenged by the lecture. She says that the vessels discovered by the local people that did had no knowledge about other materials which were located near the vessels, therefore, could not recognize them and probably thrown away.
Secondly, the writer contends that copper cylinders inside the jars are similar copper in Seleucia. The article notes these cylinders used for holding scrolls and they had not this power to generate electricity. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that this speech is true, but some inventors latter realized that if you mix copper cylinder with an iron rod and some liquid, will create electricity. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the cylinders used originally for one goal then improved them to use for another purpose.
Finally, it is stated in the article that in ancient times there were no devices that depended on electricity. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that the vessels as the battery could produce mild shock, that it can convince evidence because in that time some people could persuade others that they had magical power with using battery. Also, she states that the electric could use for medicine purposes likewise contemporary period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. Fires in Yellowstone park 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. Problems for sending human to MArs 83
- what do you think about using strike rules to handling and storage of coal ash products? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as electric batteries in ancient times. The lecture challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...enges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that readin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11971830986 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45401063987 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531690140845 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7154046883 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118841048819 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478091136685 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362646220679 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796157684495 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477278812329 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.