Rainforest should be deforested or not?
The reading and the lecture both talk about deforestation and their effects on the communities. While the author of the article talks argues that deforestation should be allowed and it helps prosper the livelihood of local citizens, the speaker negates it with logical reasoning and effective alternatives. Their position is that we need to be concerned by long term effects of deforestation, making it a disadvantage despite the short-term economic gains.
Firstly, according to the article, the writer’s central point was that the increase in population will cause and higher demand for food supplies, hence deforestation will help in land creation for farming and livestock management. Building on that, the article also mentions these methods will increase the workflow for locals, boosting the local economy and giving them a chance to export their goods. This specific argument is challenged by the speaker, when they claim that deforestation for food, has caused some countries about 60% of their rainforest, hence we need to come up with alternative ways like Hydroponics to match the food requirement. Additionally, the speaker suggests us to use the technological advancements to find moderate path to increase the food production without affecting the rainforests.
Secondly, the author suggests to also point out that the population influx might cause a demand in residential spaces, hence the new bare land will be adequate spaces for residential complexes. They also go onto suggest that this will bolster the economy as investors will buy land and infuse your locality with working capital and jobs for the citizens. Although, the speaker asserts this cutting down of forest may cause major loss for flora and fauna of the diverse wildlife, also decreasing the average oxygen production by 28%
Finally, the author puts forward the idea of deforestation and the processes around it have been major job producers for many countries for the past decade, hence stopping it will put them at an unprepared financial risk. They content that with examples like Brazil, Indonesia, and Thailand, to make us understand the gravity of the situation. In contrast, the lecturer’s stance clearly states that in long term this only supports the whims of the businessman, also causing irreparable damages to the local rainforests. They claim that they specifically target developing nations, where these businessmen can employ people at lower wages to in unsafe work conditions in order to earn some money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-16 | Anurag96 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
- N A 3
- Some people claim that the nation s government should preserve its wilderness areas in the natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain 83
- In most professions and economic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding processes'?
Suggestion: the surrounding processes
...s forward the idea of deforestation and the processes around it have been major job producers for many ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1373.03311258 154% => OK
No of words: 396.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35101010101 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88572949192 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 145.348785872 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 419.366225166 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8357758935 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.0 110.228320801 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4615384615 21.698381199 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139086968066 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471776782501 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605778867725 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846287085174 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739921815924 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.3589403974 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 63.6247240618 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.