Both essay and lecture discuss Agnostic behaviors. The author suggests three theories of these behaviors. Lecturer, however, rebuts all of these explanations. He believes none of these ideas can accurately explain Agnosic behaviors.
First of all, the writer of reading claims that these animals might be free-swimming predators which usually fed on smaller animals. The professor challenges this idea by mentioning that most of the predators hold a powerful sense of vision. Since these species were suffering from a weakness in vision, they probably hadn't been predators. Moreover, the man states that if Agnostics were predator, they should at least hold another powerful sensory organ. But, this isn't observed in their fossils.
Second, the author believes that these animals lived on the sea floors and, they fed on organisms or bacteria on the floor of the see. The lecturer rejects this claim either. He mentions that animals which live on the sea floors are often slow species, hence their habitat is limited; however, Agnostics lived in multiple areas. This shows that these animals were quick and, couldn't stay on the floor of the sea.
Third, the essay says that they might be some kind of parasites. The professor tors this claim. He points out that parasites' population often is limited because a large group of them can kill off the animal which they feed on. On the other hand, evidence has shown that there have been large groups of these animals so, they probably weren't parasites.
- TPO44-Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 70
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOEFL T P O 46 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 48- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...rom a weakness in vision, they probably hadnt been predators. Moreover, the man state...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...other powerful sensory organ. But, this isnt observed in their fossils. Second, the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...hows that these animals were quick and, couldnt stay on the floor of the sea. Third, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
...sor tors this claim. He points out that parasites population often is limited because a l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...oups of these animals so, they probably werent parasites.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, at least, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10569105691 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38761539009 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60162601626 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5211935555 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.8823529412 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125109454604 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476206484174 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584781310272 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756589150008 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308979020459 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.