reading passage puts forward the claim that Robert E. Peary had in fact reach the North Pole. However, the professor does not concur with it and maintains that there is no convincing evidence to prove this idea. He uses three points to support his opinion.
Initially, the professor questions the report provided by the National Geographic Society. According to the reading passage, the committee advocates that Peary had indeed reached the North Pole after examine his records and equipment. Differing from the statement, the professor casts doubt on it. He points out, this investigation is not objective, for the committee is led by a Peary's close friend who sponsored him during his adventure. What's more, the investigation only last two days, which must not be taken seriously. In this situation, the result from this investigation is full of prejudice and not worth trusting.
Moreover, the author of the reading passage cites an expedition to support his claim. Using the identical kind of dogsled, another explorer Tom Avery reached the North Pole within 37 days, which prove that Peary could manage this task as well. Nevertheless, the professor points out 2 differences. First, Tom carried less weight than Peary. All his food was provided by airplanes during his trip. Second,
Tom’s trip was under much more favorable weather conditions than what Peary experienced.
Finally, as the reading passage uses Peary's photographs as evidence, the professor argues that it does not prove anything. He admits that although we can analyze the shadow in the photos, it requires to be extremely precise. But the photos of Peary do not reach this standard. What's more, these pictures are becoming faded and discolored, we cannot use modern techniques to acquire accurate results. This is why this evidence is not trustworthy.
The reading passage puts forward the claim that Robert E. Peary had in fact reach the North Pole. However, the professor does not concur with it and maintains that there is no convincing evidence to prove this idea. He uses three points to support his opinion.
Initially, the professor questions the report provided by the National Geographic Society. According to the reading passage, the committee advocates that Peary had indeed reached the North Pole after examine his records and equipment. Differing from the statement, the professor casts doubt on it. He points out, this investigation is not objective, for the committee is led by a Peary's close friend who sponsored him during his adventure. What's more, the investigation only last two days, which must not be taken seriously. In this situation, the result from this investigation is full of prejudice and not worth trusting.
Moreover, the author of the reading passage cites an expedition to support his claim. Using the identical kind of dogsled, another explorer Tom Avery reached the North Pole within 37 days, which prove that Peary could manage this task as well. Nevertheless, the professor points out 2 differences. First, Tom carried less weight than Peary. All his food was provided by airplanes during his trip. Second,
Tom’s trip was under much more favorable weather conditions than what Peary experienced.
Finally, as the reading passage uses Peary's photographs as evidence, the professor argues that it does not prove anything. He admits that although we can analyze the shadow in the photos, it requires to be extremely precise. But the photos of Peary do not reach this standard. What's more, these pictures are becoming faded and discolored, we cannot use modern techniques to acquire accurate results. This is why this evidence is not trustworthy.
- The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scientist have long wondered what cause 70
- reading passage puts forward the claim that Robert E. Peary had in fact reach the North Pole. However, the professor does not concur with it and maintains that there is no convincing evidence to prove this idea. He uses three points to support his opinio 86
- A or DA: Governments shouldfocus its budgets more on environmental protection than on economicdevelopment. 76
- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, the environment of the North Slop 86
- A or DA: Governments should focus its budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...who sponsored him during his adventure. Whats more, the investigation only last two d...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by airplanes during his trip. Second, Tom's trip was under much more favo...
^^^
Line 8, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...os of Peary do not reach this standard. Whats more, these pictures are becoming faded...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'in fact', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269794721408 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.17008797654 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0351906158358 0.0723426182421 49% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0674486803519 0.0435111971325 155% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0469208211144 0.0277247811725 169% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0909090909091 0.128828473217 71% => OK
Participles: 0.0410557184751 0.0370669169778 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67883890278 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0175953079179 0.0208969081088 84% => OK
Particles: 0.0058651026393 0.00154638098197 379% => OK
Determiners: 0.111436950147 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0117302052786 0.0158828679856 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0146627565982 0.0114777025283 128% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1843.0 1645.83664459 112% => OK
No of words: 296.0 271.125827815 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22635135135 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287162162162 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216216216216 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152027027027 0.113142543107 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67883890278 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.539623497131 113% => OK
Word variations: 67.9040016368 53.8517498576 126% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0529801325 153% => OK
Sentence length: 14.8 21.7502111507 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8652764223 49.3711431718 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.15 132.220823453 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 21.7502111507 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.878197800319 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 43.5162162162 50.5018328374 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.41237113402 1.90840788429 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.678809233108 0.549887131256 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0582578676112 0.142949733639 41% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0485204468788 0.0787303798458 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.467186217412 0.631733273073 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182137424197 0.139662658121 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219115987999 0.266732575781 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157171375203 0.103435571967 152% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.249227244636 0.414875509568 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.185218924571 0.0530846634433 349% => No any connections among paragraphs
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.423748896795 0.40443939384 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.303900688898 0.0528353158467 575% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.