The reading states that Fuel-cell engines have several advantegous over internal-combustion engins and they can be a good replacement for them and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explained that it is true that internal-combustion engins pollute the air and are finite resorce but hydrogen is not a godd replacement for them and it is not available as easily as the reading explained and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that internal-combustion engins relies on petroleum which is a finite resource and indespite hydrogen can be driven from various plentiful sources. The professor refutes this point by saying that hydrogen is not easily usable. He states that to obtaine pure liquid hydrogen we need a really hard technology. He mentioned that for producing pure hydrogen we have to keep it in a really cold invironment which is not practical and easily feasible.
Second, the reading posits that hydrogen-based fuell cells can solve the world's pollution problem as the only byprduct of the fuel-cell engines are water. However, the professor claims that this is not a good solution for the pollution problem which internal-combustion engins brings to the environmen. According to professor purification of the hydrogen and creation of oil produce lots of pollution.
Third, the article avers that fuel-cell engines are economically competitive with current engines and people will spend less money to operate this engines. The professor opposes this point by explaining that operating these engines are not cost less than internal-combustion engins. Based on the lecture manufactering fuel-cells is really expensive as they need some kinds of metal that are really expensive and without that metal, the automobile cannot produce the required electericity which is need to start the automobile.
The reading states that Fuel-cell engines have several advantegous over internal-combustion engins and they can be a good replacement for them and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explained that it is true that internal-combustion engins pollute the air and are finite resorce but hydrogen is not a godd replacement for them and it is not available as easily as the reading explained and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that internal-combustion engins relies on petroleum which is a finite resource and indespite hydrogen can be driven from various plentiful sources. The professor refutes this point by saying that hydrogen is not easily usable. He states that to obtaine pure liquid hydrogen we need a really hard technology. He mentioned that for producing pure hydrogen we have to keep it in a really cold invironment which is not practical and easily feasible.
Second, the reading posits that hydrogen-based fuell cells can solve the world's pollution problem as the only byprduct of the fuel-cell engines are water. However, the professor claims that this is not a good solution for the pollution problem which internal-combustion engins brings to the environmen. According to professor purification of the hydrogen and creation of oil produce lots of pollution.
Third, the article avers that fuel-cell engines are economically competitive with current engines and people will spend less money to operate this engines. The professor opposes this point by explaining that operating these engines are not cost less than internal-combustion engins. Based on the lecture manufactering fuel-cells is really expensive as they need some kinds of metal that are really expensive and without that metal, the automobile cannot produce the required electericity which is need to start the automobile.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 73
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline. One hypothesis i 80
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a co-worker (someone you work closely with)? 70
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ydrogen-based fuell cells can solve the worlds pollution problem as the only byprduct ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solution for the pollution problem which internal-combustion engins brings to the...
^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...people will spend less money to operate this engines. The professor opposes this poi...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257328990228 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.166123778502 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100977198697 0.0723426182421 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0618892508143 0.0435111971325 142% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0358306188925 0.0277247811725 129% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114006514658 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0293159609121 0.0370669169778 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.23740548446 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0195439739414 0.0208969081088 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.114006514658 0.128158765124 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0162866449511 0.0158828679856 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0162866449511 0.0114777025283 142% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1860.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 288.0 271.125827815 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.45833333333 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.434027777778 0.374372842146 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.329861111111 0.287516216867 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.222222222222 0.187439937562 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159722222222 0.113142543107 141% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23740548446 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496527777778 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.5819338162 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7319975916 49.3711431718 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 132.220823453 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.878197800319 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 56.9861111111 50.5018328374 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.51851851852 1.90840788429 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.639136616982 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.150344806856 0.142949733639 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0957876238018 0.0787303798458 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.628695555245 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11222342882 0.139662658121 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.284118512087 0.266732575781 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195320868266 0.103435571967 189% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.366588453318 0.414875509568 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0687515529548 0.0530846634433 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.453231484884 0.40443939384 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20130596652 0.0528353158467 381% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.