Bot the reading and the listening discuss the recent trend of reading less literature than before. The author believes that there are three negative consequences for this trend. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that none of these consequences are correct.
To begin with, the author suggests that reading less literature books will decrease the cognitive abilities of the public, since most of the literature books spur our imagination to work and enhance our intellectual abilities. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She mentions that there are other books like science writing and history, which are not literature, but they are of a higher quality that can induce our imagination, creativity and intellectual functions in an appropriate manner. Thus, We should not assume that only literature books can improve our imagination.
Secondly, the writer argues that this trend will dramatically reduce the culture level because people spend their time on other unbeneficial forms of amusements and reading ostensible written books. The lecturer, however, rebuts this point by asserting that there are a lot of valuable forms of entertainment that would not lower the cultural level of the community such as listening to music or watching movies. In addition, she says that not all the non literature entertainments are trivial or unimportant. As a result, there are different kinds of entertainment that speak directly to the community.
Finally, the author posits that nowadays the talented authors of the literature books are not supported at all. The lecturer, in contrast, casts doubt on this claim by pointing out that it is most likely the author's fault and not the readers. This is because their writings are very difficult to understand. thus they got less support.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Bot the reading and the listening discus...
^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...allenges the claims made by the author. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne of these consequences are correct. To begin with, the author suggests that ...
^^^
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t can induce our imagination, creativity and intellectual functions in an appropr...
^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... creativity and intellectual functions in an appropriate manner. Thus, We should not assume that only l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re books can improve our imagination. Secondly, the writer argues that this tr...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that speak directly to the community. Finally, the author posits that nowadays...
^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...tings are very difficult to understand. thus they got less support.
^^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...tings are very difficult to understand. thus they got less support.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, thus, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27242524917 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8306622665 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541528239203 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.4496531059 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3529411765 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201704620643 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593537696207 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069793840999 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112950630248 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428220738555 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.