Changes in environment brings about the decrease of frog species and population, which will have bad impact on ecosystems where they are living. The author presents three solutions to the problem, all of which are considered ineffectively by the professor in the lecture.
First off, preventing farmers from using pesticides which is harmful to frogs is dismissed by the professor. Because farmers make a living with the crops, they may lose a large number of those when pesticides are not allowed to use and cannot compete with other farmers who use them. That is why the professor thinks it is not an economically practical and fair way.
As for to protect frogs from being infected with fungus thickening their skin, the professor points out every frog need to be treat with medication, which is too complex and difficult a work to finish. Also, the medication cannot be inherited by their offspring, as a result, the medication would have to be applied again and again.
Last, the professor does admit that frogs' habitats like lakes and marshes should be protected. Nevertheless, what destroys their habitats is not due to human activities, instead global warming is the most important threat. Thus, the situation is not likely to change by strict regulations on water use and development.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 80
- TPO 47 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... a living with the crops, they may lose a large number of those when pesticides are not allowed t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, as for, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09813084112 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73158321491 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630841121495 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3141614653 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173776218193 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608697545674 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051541031851 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995053382049 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404298318449 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.