Rembrandt the Dutch painter
The reading discusses one of the famous paintings of Rembrandt the Dutch painter from the 17th century. the painting in question is “Portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet”
The lecturer agrees with what’s mentioned in the reading then she gives further explanation for the doubts about whether the painting belonged to Rembrandt the famous painter
First, she mentioned research has been done on the pigments on the fur collar by x-ray and it was proved that fur collar was added 100 years after the original painting was done. So, the claim about inconsistency between the bonnet and the collar is not valid.
Moreover, the light and shadow of the original painting showed clearly when the fur collar was removed, it was just a simple collar of light color so it’s right the face isn’t shadowed because the original color is light not dark. consequently that further confirm his master piecing skills with the light and shadow .
Lastly but not least, the painter already had another famous painting that was made of pieces of wood glued together. However, concerning this painting in specific, adding the fur collar required whoever did this to add more pieces of wood.
To put it in a nutshell, the lecture was able to prove that that the painting belongs to Rembrandt the Dutch painter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...he Dutch painter from the 17th century. the painting in question is “Portrait of an...
^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of an elderly woman in a white bonnet” The lecturer agrees with what’s mentione...
^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...belonged to Rembrandt the famous painter First, she mentioned research has been d...
^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...tency between the bonnet and the collar is not valid. Moreover, the light and sha...
^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...e the original color is light not dark. consequently that further confirm his master piecing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: consequently,
...e the original color is light not dark. consequently that further confirm his master piecing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...piecing skills with the light and shadow . Lastly but not least, the painter alre...
^^
Line 6, column 56, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...nutshell, the lecture was able to prove that that the painting belongs to Rembrandt the D...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95475113122 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40281011931 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556561085973 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.897912075 49.2860985944 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.875 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194133000273 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121249483441 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164368888331 0.0662205650399 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149046707269 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149214553847 0.0443174109184 337% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.