Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.
First, there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing, would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency.
Second, Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. But below the face is the dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect it. So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears. Rembrandt would never have made such an error.
Finally, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood.
The article and thelecture are both about Rembrandt painting. The writer of the article is feels that this painting is could be a some others work not a Rembrandt painting. The lecturer challengers the claims made by the author. He thinks that this painting is belongs to Rembrandt.
First of all, the author argue that the lady who is in the painting is waring a luxurious fur collar coat which is not suitable for that picture since that lady is wearing a cheep white linen cap. This point is challenge by the lecturer. He claims that the X-ray analizis of that picture says that that coat is drown 100 years after the original painting is done.
Secondly, the author suggest that Rembrandt is a master of paintig ligtht and shadow. The article notes that the face should be light in color insted of dark since the face is illuminated by a the light reflected onto it from bellow. The lecture rebuts this argument. He suggest that there was a light color cloth in original picture and some one has change it.
Finally, the author state that Rembrandt is a painter who use single panel of wood to drow his painting. Moreover the article says that Rembrandt have use sevaral pices of wood panels glued to gether in theis picture. In contrast the lecturers position is that recently by some one added this wood panels and glued to gether. He notes that some one has done this to this picture to get a better appearance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | f.jafary66@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | sandeshbhandari2 | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | shingwa | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Suthasith | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Chara | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 60
- The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers’ crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad mul 65
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...the article is feels that this painting is could be a some others work not a Rembr...
^^
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e others work not a Rembrandt painting. The lecturer challengers the claims made by...
^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'drowned'.
Suggestion: drowned
... of that picture says that that coat is drown 100 years after the original painting i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: light
...e article notes that the face should be light in color insted of dark since the face is illumi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...f dark since the face is illuminated by a the light reflected onto it from bellow. Th...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...w. The lecture rebuts this argument. He suggest that there was a light color cloth in o...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 339, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ght color cloth in original picture and some one has change it. Finally, the author...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndt is a painter who use single panel of wood to drow his painting. Moreover the ...
^^
Line 13, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...le panel of wood to drow his painting. Moreover the article says that Rembrandt have us...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 223, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ls glued to gether in theis picture. In contrast the lecturers position is that recently...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 275, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
... lecturers position is that recently by some one added this wood panels and glued to get...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 342, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...nels and glued to gether. He notes that some one has done this to this picture to get a ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64566929134 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30035835976 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492125984252 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8296014272 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6666666667 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189486307788 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070655467351 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668479158066 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120868692172 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694825903552 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 12.2367328918 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.