Rembrandt portrait
The passage states about most known painter Rembrandt's older woman painting doubted by the experts that the painting was not his original masterpiece which is disagreed by lecturer with following statements.
First of all, the reading passage rises evidence that older woman dress was inconsistent due to her servant hat and precious fur. This statement criticized by lecturer that the fur was painted after the painting was done to increasing value by overlying original painting. For example, luxurious fur made older woman look more wealthier than poor servant.
Secondly, reading passage believes that portrait's unfitted shadow and light indicating the painting was not Rembrandt's because such famous painter would not make mistake on such thing. However, lecturer gives evidence that the lady was wearing white cotton,the natural light and dress color will reflect shadow to face but additional fur makes painting unrealistic.
Lastly, the last evidence reading passage state about is wood that supports back of the painting. In original portrait wood was glued together but there is no painting glued pieces of wood in his painting. This statement was explained by lecturer that those glued wood was added after the painting was done also to increase painting value and make painting more grande. Moreover, Rembrandt used to glued wood in his some painting such as his portrait with hat.
In conclusion, lecturer have struck contrast with the passage by denying every fact mentioned in reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- If you could go back to some time and place to live with less pollution, would you want to go? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing games teaches us about life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summerise information by selecting and reporting the main feature 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'wealthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: wealthier
...le, luxurious fur made older woman look more wealthier than poor servant. Secondly, reading p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...e that the lady was wearing white cotton,the natural light and dress color will refl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, lastly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38396624473 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47343053375 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540084388186 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4718042858 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125984676135 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607386506405 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928939834009 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702193141156 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602435948778 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.