represents several measures have been proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia.
The reading passage represents several measures have been proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia. However, the professor casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article one way to prevent the spread of the toad would be to build a national fence. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that fence is not so efficient way for prevent of them especially when cane toads are young and sometimes they spread their eggs inside these parts of Australia.
Second, the reading claims that the toads could be captured and destroyed by volunteers. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justified the information presented in the article and make the points that untraining volunteers maybe can not recognize between baby frogs and young cane toads and lack of knowledge between them cause destroy all the ecosystem.
Third, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that researchers are developing a disease-causing virus to control the cane population. In the same way, the speaker validates the idea and adds that this approach maybe has consequence on the vegetable habitat and attack the other species and make the ecological disaster.
To sum up, the writer and speaker both hold a conflicting view about different ways to stop the spread of the canes. It' s clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-09 | Shrushti Krishna Vishwasrao | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-14 | Elhamsarvari | 76 | view |
- Debates as to the story of the burning mirror that the greek navy used to attack the roman 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 60
- fossils collector business 80
- Problems with writer s explanations for mass extinction at the end of the Triassic period 60
- fossils collector business
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09243697479 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64887226131 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4436603447 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.2 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339152573522 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137553471272 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.243112699533 0.0662205650399 367% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195256749325 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215389375519 0.0443174109184 486% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.