Salton sea salinity
Both reading passage and the lecture are about Salton Sea salinity. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out that there are some flaws in the writer's claims. In Fact the reading passage states that we can decrease Salton Sea salinity by three methods. While the professor believes that the solutions are not appropriate and addresses in detail, the trouble in each point made in the reading text.
First and foremost, the reading article states that salinity can be reduced in special desalination facilities. The professor believes that there are weaknesses in the author's position and opposes the point by indicating that the solid material that is left behind as a result of water evaporation possesses health risk to the population. For instance, Selenium is toxic chemical reasons for many ailments in the human race.
Secondly, the text outlines that as Pacific Ocean is 20% less saline. It can be use to dilute the salt level in the lake by constructing canals and pipelines. Nevertheless, the lecturer argues that as the Pacific Ocean is too far from the lake, it will be very expensive to build canals and pipelines. Along with this, government have not enough resources to fund it.
Next, the author claims that we can also control salinity by constructing walls to divide the lake into several sections. On the other hand, the lecturer totally rejected the idea as she said geological disasters such as earthquakes may result in demolishment of walls. Which in turn results in the mixing of the water and also waste of capital.
It is quite visible that the author and lecturer had conflicting views about controlling salinity of the Salton Sea. They are having trouble finding common ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | nusybah | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 90 | view |
- In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- YOUR FRIEND WANTS TO LOSE WEIGHT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 70
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First the inc 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...fic Ocean is 20% less saline. It can be use to dilute the salt level in the lake by...
^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...fic Ocean is 20% less saline. It can be use to dilute the salt level in the lake by...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01374570447 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59228643962 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6321315212 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1875 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234751292495 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754816072537 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133740342496 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13239649012 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123652864762 0.0443174109184 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.