The science of archaeology was faced with serious problems and limitations for the most of the 20th century.
This material addresses the question of the development of archaeology in the United Kingdom. The reading passage suggests that there were significant limitations for its development in the twentieth century. The lecturer, on the other hand, stresses out that the situation in this sphere changed seriously after new rules and guidelines were adopted in 1990s.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that increasing construction in Britain led to the destruction of many archaeologically valuable sites inasmuch construction was not being stopped even if artifacts were being found in the corresponding areas. Meanwhile, the professor argues that the new guidelines envisage a rule according to which the construction area must be examined from the archaeological point of view and the discovered values must be preserved before the construction is continued.
Additionally, the article posits that the lack of financial support or donorship from the government resulted in paying less attention to the examination of important sites. However, the professor states that the new rules oblige the construction companies to finance the archaeological related works and, therefore, the overall situation is improving.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that only limited amount of workplaces were available for people who wanted to become archaeologists. This in turn affected the state of affairs in field of archaeology. At the same time, according to the listening passage on of the effects of the mentioned regulations was the fact that the demand for professional archaeologists increased so that the number of relevant professionals in Britain increased, too.
- This material addresses the question of whether the researchers found actual tissues of Tyrannosaurus rex. The reading passage suggests three arguments to support the view that the leg bone of the dinosaur contained remains of blood vessels, red blood cel 76
- Movies and television have negative effects on young people. 80
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 90
- Essay topics: TPO 49- Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new f 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...r new rules and guidelines were adopted in 1990s. To begin with, the reading passage hi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of many archaeologically valuable sites inasmuch construction was not being stop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, therefore, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64960629921 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25035946161 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590551181102 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.627789359 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147503429367 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532503824787 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429334267942 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789949495617 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373504846604 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.