Sea okras
The writer and the lecturer discuss the possible factors that may have decreased sea otter population. While the writer of the article feels that pollution is the main reason that is causing sea otter population to plummet, the lecturer states that attacks by the predators is responsible for the decline in sea otter population.
Firstly, the writer claims that environmental pollution is responsible for the sea otter population to decline because water samples exhibited that there are more than usual chemicals in the seas owing to industrial wastes or oil rigs and these chemicals are life-threatening to the sea otters. The lecturer refutes this claim by stating that if sea otters were killed by the hazardous chemicals then they would wash up in the shores but no sea otters were found dead in the shores. Hence, the lecturer states that the sea otters were killed and eaten by their predators in the sea and their bodies were not found.
Secondly, according to the article not only sea otters but other mammals such as sea lions were decreasing in number, therefore, the writer argued that it had to be environmental pollution that was causing populations of many mammals of the same ecosystem to decline. Furthermore, the writer refuses to hold predation responsible for the populations of these mammals to decline because predators such ocras prefer whales over these smaller mammals. On the other hand, the lecturer challenges this argument by stating that since the population of the whales declined ocras have changed their diet and hunt smaller mammals such sea otters more than they usually did.
Lastly, the article mention that in some parts population of sea otters decreased more than other parts. Hence, the writer feels that due to uneven distribution of pollution this disparity occurred. The lecturer, however, asserts that some parts were more accessible to ocras hence sea otter population declined more in those specific regions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-13 | arifsadi19 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parts'' or 'part's'?
Suggestion: parts'; part's
...astly, the article mention that in some parts population of sea otters decreased more...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17610062893 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61907967413 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449685534591 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3358772766 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.636363636 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06452816374 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226853118611 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117210849053 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663715713784 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164678189561 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585563755236 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.