sea otter decline
First of all, the author suggests that source of chemical pollution founded along the sea coast and infection may be coused by this, is environmental reason of sea otter decline. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that if the infection is reason of reduction of them, the rate of declining should be more than this. Also there aren't any sea otter body along the coast that implies predators are reason of this reduction, cuz the sea otters are eaten by predators after hunting by them.
Secondly, the writer contend that reductioin in other sea mmamels numbers is the obvious emblem of the statement that environmental pollution is likely couse of this, becouse pollution affects the whole ecosystem. The lecturer, on the other hand, rebuts this by asserting that orcas hunt sea otter and other sea mammals becouse the main hunt of them that are whales disappeard due to humun activity.
Finaly, it is stated in the article, uneven concentrations of pollution results in uneven decline patterns. the lecturer, however, posits this statement by mentioning that accessibility of sea otter residance to predator is the reason of uneven rate of decline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... of declining should be more than this. Also there arent any sea otter body along th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ng should be more than this. Also there arent any sea otter body along the coast that...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ion results in uneven decline patterns. the lecturer, however, posits this statemen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 193.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10880829016 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6803645167 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.01822591 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367531915864 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148527988721 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939319325316 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250939974509 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640925506294 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.