Shakespeare and his work
Both the reading and the lecture are about Shakespeare and his work. In this set of materials, the author strongly postulates that the facts about Shakespeare and his work are mere rumors and the work done under his name is created by other people and provides three theories to endorse its idea. However, the professor explains the inaccuracy of the author by declaring that although the record is few, the theories about Shakespeare's autobiography mentioned in the reading are completely wrong and gainsays each of them.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that Francis Bacon and Shakespeare supported similar legal ideas which were also shown through Shakespeare's poems. So the poems were actually written by Francis Bacon. On the other hand, the professor contradicts this idea that their viewpoint was not identical. The scientific and especially astronomical believe Shakespeare had do not match with that of Francis Bacon. Therefore, the work of Shakespeare was his own creation.
Next, the speaker further delves into the details that the poems written by Christopher Marlowe who lived in the same period as that of Shakespeare's was published after his death. His funeral was not fake and although he was a religious criminal, his poems got out in the public. In fact, 154 sonnets of Shakespeare were introduced at that time, hence there is no logical reason to use his name for Marlowe's work. These claims refute the points mentioned in the reading about the escape from the execution of Christopher Marlowe and how he continued writing under Shakespeare's name after his death.
Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by mentioning a noble class writer Edward de Vere who used Shakespeare's identity to take public appraisal. The professor refutes this point by showing the inaccuracy of the author that Edward de Vere died before Shakespeare got famous due to his remarkable art. His poem was published in 1621 after the death of Edward who died in 1604. Moreover, nobody knew what Shakespeare wanted to publish before he did.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-18 | RicardoRH | 71 | view |
2021-02-03 | Safa Arshad | 83 | view |
2021-01-06 | bhimsen | 81 | view |
2015-06-02 | SarahAlsalihi | 65 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Why city should build an indoor park 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Colonization in asteroids as compare to other planets 3
- signs of volaco eruption 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
... scientific and especially astronomical believe Shakespeare had do not match with that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...ly astronomical believe Shakespeare had do not match with that of Francis Bacon. T...
^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...ly astronomical believe Shakespeare had do not match with that of Francis Bacon. T...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14880952381 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70454994768 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2859607273 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501860617534 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187042168368 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159836540509 0.0662205650399 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320837201857 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882396236174 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.