Sinosauroteryx
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading passage in rather Sinosauroteryx had feathers or not. First of all, the reading says that the fine lines in the fossil might be fibers instead of feathers. However, the listening argues that it is unlikely that the lines are fibers. There are no evidence shows that the dinosaur's skin had been decompose. Besides, there are other animals' fossil had been found and they are all well preserve. As a result, the Sinosauroteryx's fossil should also be well preserve. As a result, if their fossils had been well preserve, how can it decompose into fibers?
Secondly, while the reading asserts that the lines are more likely to be frills instead of feathers, the listening implies that there is a specific protein that can solve this problem. This protein can only be found in the feathers, none of the researchers can find this protein in the frills. As a result, this is a distinctive point that can indicate the lines are evidence of fibers. In other words, this protein is extremely important because it can show rather it is a feather or a frill.
Last but not least, the reading suggests that the lines in the Sinosauroteryx fossil were located along the backbone or the tail which is not for flying. However, the listening argues that feathers may have some other proposes. For example, the peacock will use its feathers for a distinct function call display function which is for attracting mates. Evidences had found that Sinosauroteryx structure is actually colorful. Therefore, these feather are use for displaying instead of flying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-05 | Steven Huang | 73 | view |
- TED 73
- agnostids 73
- Is it easier for a person today to become an educated person than in the past 77
- In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce its spending? 1. Arts 2. Scientific research 3. Parks and public gardens. 66
- Some people think that some lesson for young students(5-8) include video games are effective ways and interesting, other people thinks that this way is distracting and wasting time? Agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decomposed'.
Suggestion: decomposed
... shows that the dinosaurs skin had been decompose. Besides, there are other animals fossi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...een decompose. Besides, there are other animals fossil had been found and they are all ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 560, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preserved'.
Suggestion: preserved
... result, if their fossils had been well preserve, how can it decompose into fibers? S...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97752808989 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65159546177 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486891385768 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6375963057 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0625 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132395121977 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590601555267 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103840552846 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920391242737 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656206128914 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.