Solutions to prevent injuries of glass to birds.
In the reading material, the author cites three reasons to support his idea that these solutions can prevent birds to collide with mirror. However, the lecturer in the listening material argues that none of these solutions is useful, and opposite the point of the reading material.
First and foremost, the author argues that one-way glass can help birds recognize the glass. Nevertheless, the lecturer offers an opposite stand that on the one-way glass outside, is reflect like a mirror, and birds do not understand mirror, if mirror reflect the sky, the bird will think the mirror is sky.
In addition, the author's second point that when birds see the colorful stripes over glass, they will not fly through this is also counteracted by the lecturer who point out that birds will think the stripes as opening hole, if a bird see a hole, they fly through it. more stripes can make the hole small, but the room will be too dark.
Finally, the author's third point that magnetic window can helps birds understand the window exist is also counteracted by the lecturer who points out that birds only navigate by the magnetic signal when they travel long distance, like from cold place to warm place, when traveling a short trip, they navigate by eyes and lights. So magnetic signal would not have much effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reflected'.
Suggestion: reflected
...d that on the one-way glass outside, is reflect like a mirror, and birds do not underst...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...rs third point that magnetic window can helps birds understand the window exist is al...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ghts. So magnetic signal would not have much effects.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87946428571 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26137554508 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.8795422846 49.2860985944 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.625 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241579168611 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102255156091 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796253525937 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137807055889 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555999828862 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.0289183223 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.