sound
The reading and lecture are both about whether scientist can detect the special sounds that sailor could hear about twenty years or not. The passage presents three explanations to posit why it is a mystery phenomenon since scientist cannot recognize any solid moving of submarine in the ocean. The professor, however, refutes all of the those explanations.
To begin with, the author of the reading claims that orca whales is a kind of animals produce sounds and because they are occupying with ritual make this sound and submarine cannot detect their voices. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this claim by mentioning that this theory is implausible, due to the fact that whales live in the superficial of ocean and submarine located in the depth of ocean, so whale's voice which have not hear by sailor.
Secondly, the article posits that in the ocean sort of animals live without any invertebrates and have soft body the names are giant squid. He assume the sound belongs to this animals and because of their body, they are not detectible. However, the professor maintains an opposite opinion that although this gigantic animal is a better candidate than whales but it is not a great idea, the sounds belong to them because they have living until now but the sound merely was been detected for two decades.
Third, the reading mention that maybe this sound is for the strange submarine of foreign country and cannot register to sonar, so submarine was not detectable. The professor, on the other hand, cast the doubt on this claim by stating that if submarine is from secret country, they should move fast and further away from Russian submarine and the sound hardly hear. Moreover, scientist cannot built the submarine which drive fast and be silent and cannot detectable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 83 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 83 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | nikki07hung | 3 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | nikki07hung | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...solid moving of submarine in the ocean. The professor, however, refutes all of the ...
^^^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... ocean. The professor, however, refutes all of the those explanations. To begin with, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'heard'.
Suggestion: heard
...f ocean, so whales voice which have not hear by sailor. Secondly, the article posit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'assumes'.
Suggestion: assumes
...soft body the names are giant squid. He assume the sound belongs to this animals and b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t squid. He assume the sound belongs to this animals and because of their body, they...
^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...e living until now but the sound merely was been detected for two decades. Third, the r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, kind of, sort of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98322147651 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45389218701 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8355050746 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257562281 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109839324481 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107158323083 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167226976461 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473531965476 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.