Speaking through social media
The reading and the lecture both talk about social media. The reading claims that this new technology has allowed many people to widespread their interactions all over the world and find a voice through the internet. Meanwhile, the lecturer expressed that social media comes with so many risks such as bullying, manipulation, etc. Not to mention that this is not only affecting children but also included adults. With the development of social media, some people have become a target for thieves taking over their identity.
The reading suggested that social media has become the greatest source of information for people who like to explore new skills. Many people have benefited from social media because they have been able to find friends who share the same interests, passions, and hobbies. Regardless, the lecturer held that when the number of social media users increased in the United States in 2004, many families were negatively affected. Families started to interact less and talk to each other just for important matters. Moreover, children relied on social media for communication and connected more through screen fields than they do with their close friends and family members. As a result, these actions created an impact on people's social skills.
Overall, the lecture and the reading address the positive and negative impacts of social media.
Although the reading marked the benefits of social media, the lecture concentrated on the risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-24 | heman@saini | 87 | view |
| 2021-03-29 | Uhernandes95 | 76 | view |
- Speaking through social media 76
- What do you consider to be the most important room in a house Why is this room more important to you than any other room Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 66
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time Compare the benefits of planning free time activities with the benefits of not 38
- Advantages of working as a team and argues by the lecturer 81
- Sea Otters decline 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t for thieves taking over their identity The reading suggested that social media ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eated an impact on peoples social skills Overall the lecture and the reading addr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive and negative impacts of social media Although the reading marked the benefits...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19313304721 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35873518542 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570815450644 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 233.0 21.2450331126 1097% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1210.0 110.228320801 1098% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 233.0 21.698381199 1074% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 52.0 7.06452816374 736% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340224367691 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.340224367691 0.0996497079465 341% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23403575071 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294924871911 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 119.5 13.3589403974 895% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -165.02 53.8541721854 -306% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 94.2 11.0289183223 854% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.3 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.19 8.42419426049 228% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 10.7273730684 531% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 95.2 10.498013245 907% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 95.0 11.2008830022 848% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.