summaries the points made in the lecture ,being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the lecture

Essay topics:

summaries the points made in the lecture ,being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the lecture

The professor refutes the examples which are mentioned in the reading passage which explain the altruistic behavior.

According to the reading passage the meerkat puts their life into danger for protecting the other meerkats without eating any food. However this example is totally refuted by the professor. According to recent study, which explain the actual behavior of the meerkat. In the lecture, professor says that, meerkat ate before going to guard their group.

Furthermore sentinel used their crying sound to save itself not for their group. Alarms sound makes alter to other meerkats,meanwhile sentinel escape it from danger because this sentinel activity puts the attention of the predator toward another meerkats.

The Professor also refuses that human show altruistic behavior by sharing food and donating body organ.Although the person donate their kidney to their relatives or a stranger without taking any money,person got the token of appreciation which is also valuable than money. So that's why professor also contracts this example.

Finally, the professor contradicted with examples of altruism which are explain in the reading passage.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2014-02-07 deepali1234 60 view
2014-02-06 deepali1234 50 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: The Professor also refuses that human show altruistic behavior by sharing food and donating body organ.Although the person donate their kidney to their relatives or a stranger without taking any money,person got the token of appreciation which is also valuable than money.
Description: The fragment person donate their is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace donate with verb, past tense

flaws:
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4

The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Don't need a conclusion.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 18 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 179 250
No. of Characters: 961 1200
No. of Different Words: 104 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.658 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.369 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.375 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.084 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.404 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.704 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4